<mrselfpwn> I don't understand why a login manager even has a daemon mode.
<spook> xdmcp or whatever its called
<spook> for seperating the server and client components of x
<mrselfpwn> spook, kind of like pty?
<mrselfpwn> and tty
<spook> mrselfpwn: uh... no.
<spook> for connecting to the x client and logging in over the network
<mrselfpwn> oh i understand
<spook> yeah.
<spook> x is counter intuitive, the part with the graphical interface is the server.
* metrofox (n=metrofox@151.56.163.211) зашел на канал ##slackware
<metrofox> hi there!
<spook> metrofox: hey!
<mrselfpwn> metrofox: hello
<metrofox> yo spook & mrselfpwn
<metrofox> what's going on guys? =)
<mrselfpwn> we were talking about you behind your back.
<metrofox> :O that's an interesting topic...
<mrselfpwn> ;D
<metrofox> :P
<mrselfpwn> actually i was just telling spook how x client works to log in over the network.
<spook> loooooool.
<mrselfpwn> XD
<mrselfpwn> that conversation was counter intuitive spook. ;)

<The-Croupier> bli: quite bored with my wife, frustrated with my gf, will i findhappiness in slack ;)

< Dravekx_> e trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System Administrator. It usually boils down to these three things: #1) Respect the privacy of others. #2) Think before you type. #3) With great power comes great responsibility. [sudo] password for dravekx: dravekx is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported. dravekx@dravekx-debian:~$
< Dravekx_> BAHAHAHAHA
< Dravekx_> WTF is all that
< Dravekx_> my own server reported me.
< Dravekx_> lol
< enmerkar> Dravekx_: man sudo, man sudoers
< Dravekx_> lol
< Dravekx_> ok Im just lost
< Dravekx_> I think I need to read more before i venture into linux.
< Dravekx_> im going back to windows.
< Dravekx_> lol

< jeev> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jaYOpbgieU
< jeev> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2BaCbVIZ1s
< thrice`> wow,
* jeev holds out his beating stick
< jeev> wow what ?
< thrice`> you never cease to amaze me jeev
< straterra> (with stupidity)
< jeev> i'm honored
< jeev> oh look, it's stratella, the guy who comes once a month with stupid comments
< straterra> jeev: I've been here since before the best part of you ran down the crack of your mom's ass and left a brown stain on the mattress
< jeev> haaaaaaaaaa haha
< jeev> you're funny.
< straterra> You aren't. Get the hint and go away already.
< jeev> sarcasm works both ways
< deco> leave jeev alone! :(
< straterra> I wasn't being sarcastic..so I don't know what 'both ways' you mean.
< jeev> deco, dont worry about him, in a few minutes he'll have to step away to his usual round of picking up his coworkers trash bags and putting new ons
< jeev> ones
< jeev> it's like this every day
< straterra> Projecting a bit, aren't you?
< jeev> welcome to my fag list
< straterra> I wouldn't say that too loud.

nostalgicBadger> mingdao - i kind of thought so. ubuntu seems pointless once you start learning bash
<slackytude> bash seems pointless, once you start learning ubuntu

< DonQuixote> heh
< Sancho_Panza> DonQuixote: soy el hombre de la mancha
< DonQuixote> yep
* Sancho_Panza gets DonQuixote's horse ready
< vastina> the fuck...?
< vastina> am i in slackware?
< DonQuixote> no
< straterra> No
< wayne_> I think it is a lenovo g530
* DonQuixote rides towards the wind mills
* Sancho_Panza follows along
< vastina> wow
< mingdao> wayne_: is that what you saw in the lshal output?
* vastina walks away
< fire|bird> vastina: nope, you're in #ubuntu in disquise.

06:35 < alienBOB> OK you fork bomb fan bois. The first who writes that code in this channel again, will be kicked from the channel. I do *not* want to see the literal code again, if it is not escaped.
Anyone who - by accident - copies/pastes the channel log of today in a console will be VERY unhappy thanks to spook
06:35 < alienBOB> And anyone asking about how to write a virus will join the exiles
06:35 < init[1]> o_O

<Twayne> what about when your keyboard is in ALL CAPS?! :P
<SelfishMan> THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH MY KEYBAORD
<SelfishMan> EXCEPT SOMEONE REVERSED MY 'A' AND 'O' KEYS

<slackytude-nfs> yeah!
<slackytude-nfs> diskless NFS root
<slackytude-nfs> insert usb stick, boot from NFS
<slackytude-nfs> great fun
<mingdao> slackytude-nfs: dropbear rules
<slackytude-nfs> mingdao, thats a ssh server, no?
<mingdao> yes
<mingdao> you start it at the boot prompt and do everything from another terminal
<mingdao> I don't install any other way.
<slackytude-nfs> yeah, but I can boot slackware on any machine now
<slackytude-nfs> oh, thats nice as well
<slackytude-nfs> the problem is, I kinda screwed up
<slackytude-nfs> I installed slackware on a NTFS filesystem and that means lot of errors on startup
<slackytude-nfs> like no ssh server
<mingdao> you what?
<slackytude-nfs> installed it on NTFS
<slackytude-nfs> which I share by NFS
<mingdao> How can you install Slackware on a NTFS filesystem?
<mingdao> How do you expect it to run?
<slackytude-nfs> it runs
<slackytude-nfs> heh
<slackytude-nfs> just not very well
<slackytude-nfs> like, it will start everything in rc.d
<slackytude-nfs> coz everything is marked executable
<slackytude-nfs> but I shall nuke the NTFS and use ext4 or sumthing
<slackytude-nfs> but still I like this
<slackytude-nfs> alrite
<slackytude-nfs> gonna kill the ntfs drive now
<slackytude-nfs> see ya

<Ether_Man> mota, I said before I believe you. Im just wondering why the msdn article is factually wrong.. Never seen one be before :/
<Ether_Man> mota, they're usually very throughly read to make sure they are correct
<mota> Ether_Man: because you are reading things that are not there. They do not say conceptually WHY system has access. You infer this and then treat it as proven fact.
<Ether_Man> mota, it does say that system has unrestricted right to everything. Which simply isnt true if it's affected by ACLs
<mota> However it does NOT say why system has unrestricted access. Don't jump to the conclusion that this is because system ignores ACLs.
<Ether_Man> mota, it would be ignoring ACLs if it had unrestricted.
<mota> That's your conclusion. As we have agreed, it is incorrect.
<mota> And I am done pointing this out, let's move on.
<Ether_Man> It's not a conclusion. It's exactly what unrestricted means.. ACL is a restriction, hence if it obeys ACL, it's restricted, not unrestricted.
<slackytude> Ether_Man, please dont do this again
<Ether_Man> slackytude, so you're saying unrestricted means the same as restricted then? -_-
<slackytude> Ether_Man, Im saying, dont keep arguing when you are plainly mistaken. you tend to get stubborn about that
<hentaiNeko> Ether_Man, normally system is given access to system fles and settings
<mota> slackytude: it's best to just move on; Ether_Man will get hung up in his one semantic point forever and it's just not worth it.
<slackytude> mota, been there, done that
<Ether_Man> slackytude, so you are saying unrestricted suddenly means restricted? Great.. Im kindof guessing that a professor in english would disagree, but hey, slackytude and mota knows better so english language obeys their definitions of the words..
<slackytude> >_<
<Ether_Man> hentaiNeko, I know. I said I was wrong about how it worked. I based my knowledge on the msdn article which, is clearly wrong. Currently Im trying to understand how mota can sit there and say that it's right, when it says the exact opposite of what it is.