Home Add Quote

Added: 2020-06-26

20:57 <lemmi> if zig had a stable language specification, i'd vote for a rewrite in zig. especially since this can be done incrementally. but for that zig needs to get to 1.0
21:04 <q66> i'd disagree on implementing in xbps in any language that's 1) not in gcc 2) doesn't have at least two stable implementations 3) isn't as portable as C/C++
21:04 <q66> so basically rust, zig etc. are all out and will always be
21:05 <maldridge> careful, that kind of logic supports a rewrite in Go