Noobfarm

Home Add Quote


#1295
Added: 2009-09-28

<Ether_Man> mota, I said before I believe you. Im just wondering why the msdn article is factually wrong.. Never seen one be before :/
<Ether_Man> mota, they're usually very throughly read to make sure they are correct
<mota> Ether_Man: because you are reading things that are not there. They do not say conceptually WHY system has access. You infer this and then treat it as proven fact.
<Ether_Man> mota, it does say that system has unrestricted right to everything. Which simply isnt true if it's affected by ACLs
<mota> However it does NOT say why system has unrestricted access. Don't jump to the conclusion that this is because system ignores ACLs.
<Ether_Man> mota, it would be ignoring ACLs if it had unrestricted.
<mota> That's your conclusion. As we have agreed, it is incorrect.
<mota> And I am done pointing this out, let's move on.
<Ether_Man> It's not a conclusion. It's exactly what unrestricted means.. ACL is a restriction, hence if it obeys ACL, it's restricted, not unrestricted.
<slackytude> Ether_Man, please dont do this again
<Ether_Man> slackytude, so you're saying unrestricted means the same as restricted then? -_-
<slackytude> Ether_Man, Im saying, dont keep arguing when you are plainly mistaken. you tend to get stubborn about that
<hentaiNeko> Ether_Man, normally system is given access to system fles and settings
<mota> slackytude: it's best to just move on; Ether_Man will get hung up in his one semantic point forever and it's just not worth it.
<slackytude> mota, been there, done that
<Ether_Man> slackytude, so you are saying unrestricted suddenly means restricted? Great.. Im kindof guessing that a professor in english would disagree, but hey, slackytude and mota knows better so english language obeys their definitions of the words..
<slackytude> >_<
<Ether_Man> hentaiNeko, I know. I said I was wrong about how it worked. I based my knowledge on the msdn article which, is clearly wrong. Currently Im trying to understand how mota can sit there and say that it's right, when it says the exact opposite of what it is.